The problem
Manual pentests are slow, episodic and expensive while AI-written code ships new vulnerabilities daily
What they do
Autonomous AI hacker that pentests enterprise web apps, APIs and AI apps continuously
Traction No revenue disclosed; early enterprise deployments, top 1% vs 125,000 human hackers
Hiring trend
- Open roles
- 8
- Ops roles
- 1
- Headcount
- ~40-65
~20 staff at Nov 2025 launch to ~40-65 (PitchBook/Tracxn 2026); 8 open roles
Latest news
Jul 2026
Launched autonomous WAF mitigation with Akamai at Black Hat; AHEAD and AWS Marketplace deals ↗Funding
- Last round
- $75M
- Stage
- Seed
- Date
- Nov 2025
Led by Greylock, Battery Ventures, Lux Capital
- Hiring+18 open roles on the live job board (3–9 roles = +1)
- Funding recency+1Seed · $75M, Nov 2025 (11 months ago): 6–12 months = +1
- Traction+0.75Some growth: No revenue disclosed; early enterprise deployments, top 1% vs 125,000 human hackers
- Red flags0None found in the last 24 months
- Total2.751 + 1 + 0.75 − 0 = 2.75 → Warm-up
Seed rule: seed-stage without strong traction starts in Warm-up whatever the score (Steady by score alone).
Distance (Unproven) is a separate read on how long the lead can last. It doesn't change the score.
Distance
Unproven
Eleven months out of stealth with no disclosed revenue; strong founders and capital, but AI pentesting is a crowded race (XBOW, Horizon3.ai, RunSybil and incumbents) with no leader yet.
Sources: Globes: $75M seed, 20 employees, founded six months earlier (Nov 2025) ↗ · Greylock: led $75M seed, early design-partner deployments ↗ · Tenzai: autonomous mitigation via Akamai WAF (Jul 2026) ↗
Open ops roles · 1
Last checked Oct 13, 2026